Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25692 (KAR)

SMT. AISHWARYA GOWDA v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT

WP/12946/2025 · 2025-06-25

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22398 WP No. 12946 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 12946 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. AISHWARYA GOWDA W/O K N HARISH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 1401, TOWER C, CARDINAL ONE, YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU – 560 022. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDESH.J. CHOUTA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. ABHISHEK.K, ADVOCATE) AND: DIRECOTRATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR BENGALURU ZONAL OFFICE, BMTC B BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR, SHANTINAGAR, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, WILSON GARDEN, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ARAVIND KAMATH, ASG ALONG WITH SRI. MADHUKAR.M. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF THE BNSS, PRAYING TO DECLARE THE ARREST OF THE PETITIONER AS ILLEGAL AND IN GROSS VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER GUARANTEED IN ARTICLE 21 AND 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IN RELATION TO ECIR NO. ECIR/BGZO/06/2025 DATED 31/03/2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22398 WP No. 12946 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 24.06.2025 seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under:- “The undersigned counsel for the above named petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit her to withdraw the present petition in view of filing of the final report and the petitioner being enlarged on bail by the Special Court vide order dated 17.06.2025 reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final report in the interest of justice”. 2. The said memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE Srl.