REVADI LAL S/O UDAY LAL MEENA v. OM LAL S/O MOTI LAL
CW/12856/2022 · 2025-01-28
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25691 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3921] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12856/2022
1. Revadi Lal S/o Uday Lal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Kavad, Tehsil Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur.
2. Samodra W/o Uday Lal, Aged About 56 Years, Resident of Kavad,
Tehsil
Chauth
Ka
Barwada,
District Sawaimadhopur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Om Lal S/o Moti Lal, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Kavad,
Tehsil
Chauth
Ka
Barwada,
District Sawaimadhopur.
2. Rukmani W/o Om Lal Meena, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Kavad, Tehsil Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur.
3. The Tehsildar, Land Holder, Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawaimadhopur.
4. Dena Bank, Sawaimadhopur.
5. Bhartiya State Bank, Town Area, Sawaimadhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/01/2025
1. Petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking expeditious disposal of the Revenue Suit for Partition filed on 01.05.2019 pending before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Chauth Ka Barwala, District Sawai Madhopur.
2. Counsel for petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition in order to ventilate the
[2025:RJ-JP:3921] (2 of 2) [CW-12856/2022] grievances of petitioner before the Board of Revenue under Section 9 of the Land Revenue Act, 1956.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /42