Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25691 (AP)

Bollineni Venkateswarlu Naidu v. Manjuluru Amruthamma

AS/393/2011 · 2025-07-20

V Srinivas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363162011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS APPEAL SUIT NO:393 of 2011 Between: Bollineni Venkateswarlu Naidu ...APPELLANT AND Manjuluru Amruthamma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N JANARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CHAVALI RAMANAND 2. M CHALAPATI RAO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on 01.07.2025 and 14.07.2025. On 14.07.2025, though this Court directed the matter to be posted under the caption for dismissal, today also, there is no representation for the appellant. 2. It appears that the appellant is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 21.07.2025 KNN