- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26069 WP No. 52665 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 52665 OF 2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. RUDRAMMA W/O CHANDRASHEKHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/O KAKKARAGOLLA VILLAGE, DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577589. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. M.S.SWATHI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. H.B. RUDRESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. T.V. MANJUNATH S/O TELIGI VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS KUMBARAPET, DAVANAGERE-577589. 2. KAVITHA W/O T.V. SOMASHEKHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 3. VEERESH S/O T.V. SOMASHEKHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, 4. VINUTHA D/O T.V. SOMASHEKHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.2 TO 4 ARE Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26069 WP No. 52665 of 2019 RESIDENTS OF D.NO.3182/39 VEERESH NILAYA DAVANAGERE-577005. 5. SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O MARULASIDDAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS D/O TELIGI VEERAPPA R/O PATIL SANGAPPA NILAYA D.NO.1425/70, 4TH CROSS BACK SIDE OF SANKETH BEAUTY PARLOUR 1ST BUS STOP, VIDHYANAGAR, DAVANAGERE-577005. 6. PREMAKUMARI W/O BASAVARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/O KAKKARAGOLLA VILLAGE DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT-577005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R.5; R.1, R.3 AND R.6 ARE SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 IN FDP NO.20/2018, DATED 17.10.2019 BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT DAVANAGERE VIDE ANNEXURE-H, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26069 WP No. 52665 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Smt.M.S.Swathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.H.B.Rudresh, learned counsel for petitioner submits that needful is not done. Hence, she seeks time. 2. On 09.07.2025, this Court has passed the following order:- "This Court on 27.06.2025 made an order that there was no representation for the petitioner; finally, a week's time was granted to do the needful. Today, the matter is listed for non furnishing of PF, etc., for issuance of notice to respondent No.4. There is no representation for the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. However, to show one indulgence, time is granted till 14.07.2025 to furnish PF, etc., for issuance of notice to respondent No.4. It is made clear that if needful is not done, appropriate orders will be passed. Re-list on 15.07.2025." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26069 WP No. 52665 of 2019 3. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE VMB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13