Mr.Polepalle Subrahmanyam Setty v. Mr.Polepalle Lakhshminarayana Setty
SA/755/2003 · 2025-03-28
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25683 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25683 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010363862003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL NO: 755/2003
Between:
1. MR.POLEPALLE SUBRAHMANYAM SETTY, S/O.ASWATHANARAYANA SETTY MR.POLEPALLE SUBRAHMANYAM SETTY, R/O.BAZAR STREET, VAYALPAD.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. MR POLEPALLE LAKHSHMINARAYANA SETTY, S/O.KRISHNAPPA SETTY R/O.BAZAR STREET, VAYALPAD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. MR POLEPALLE RAJAGOPAL SETTY DIED, SOCIETY LIMITED, PEGADAPALLY, KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, REP.
BY ITS CHAIRMAN/PERSON-IN-CHARGE.
3. SMT POLEPALLE INDIRAMMA, W/O.RAJAGOPAL SETTY R/O. H.NO.4/37, BAZAR STREET, VAYALPAD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. SMT P NAGAMANI, W/O.SRI AMARNATH R/O.H.NO.15-5-4, VENKATESWARA SWAMY STREET, HINDUPUR TOWN- 515 201.
5. MR POLEPALLE RADHAKRISHNA, S/O.LATE RAGAGOPAL SETTY.
6. MR POLEPALLE VENKATESH KIRAN, S/O.LATE RAJAGOAPL SETTY.
7. MR KRISHNAPPAGARI RAMANA, S/O.CHENNAPPA R/O.YERRAPPAGARIPALLE, MUSTOOR, NIMMANAPALLE (M).
8. MR GANGAPURAM RAMANA, S/O.NARASAPPA CULTIVATION R/O.KOMMAGALLAPALLE, MUSTOOR, NIMMANAPALLE (M).
9. MR POLEPALLE SURYANARAYANA SETTY, S/O.KRISHNAPPA SETTY
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.
V B SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
2. R RADHA KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.755 OF 2003 J U D G M E N T:
None appeared for the appellant, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. There was no representation for the appellant today, as well as on the previous adjournment.
2. Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 to 5 is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
28.03.2025 Pmk
24
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
SECOND APPEAL No.755 OF 2003
Date:28.03.2025 Pmk