- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22886 WP No. 15059 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 15059 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. K. SHEKH AHMED, C/O LATE KUTTI SAB, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, WARD NO.24, GOWRI KALUVE, VTC CHIKMAGALUR POST, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 101. 2. K. SYIAD AHAMAD, C/O LATE KUTTI SAB, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OPP. MADEENA MASJID, T. M. ROAD, MELINAPETE, KOPPA, CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 126. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE) AND: THE TAHSILDAR, KOPPA TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR DISTIRCT - 577 126. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT DATED 19.02.25, PRODUCED HEREIN AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22886 WP No. 15059 of 2025 THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for the respondent. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are assailing order dated 19.02.2025 at Annexure-A issued by respondent herein. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned AGA, the impugned notice has been issued to protect the existing road by the respondent-authority. 4. In that view of the matter, taking into consideration as it is reflected in the order dated 19.02.2025, the respondent-authority has considered the existence of the road as per the village map, and I am of the opinion that, in order to protect the interest of public, Annexure-A has been issued by the respondent-authority. Therefore, I am of the view that, there is no perversity in the impugned order at Annexure-A. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22886 WP No. 15059 of 2025 5. In view of dismissal of the petition, I.A.No.1/2025 does not survive for consideration and the same stands dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35