Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25681 (AP)

P.VENKAIAH NAIDU v. K.KONDAIAH

SA/820/2002 · 2025-06-24

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363032002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAYJHE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 820 OF 2002 Appeal under section 100 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dated 12.06.2002 made in A.S No.48 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge Markapur Preferred against the Decree in O.S No.156 of 1986 Dated 21.01.1998 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge Darsi. Between: Parna Venkaiah Naidu, S/o Chenniah aged 75, Advocate Resident of Kanigiri Village & Mandalam Prakasam District. ...APPELLANT/PETITIONER AND Kokkera Kondaiah S/o Yerraiah aged 75 years, Resident of Gangalammapeta, Tenali town and Mandalam, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT : P SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent: M V S SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following JUDGMENT : APHC010363032002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 820/2002 Between: P.venkaiah Naidu ...APPELLANT AND K Kondaiah ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.P SRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.M VS SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following Judgment: Sri P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant appearing through Video Conference would submit that already it was represented that the sole appellant died and the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant are not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and hence, necessary orders may be rendered in this appeal. 2 2. No representation for the respondent. In that view of the matter, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated by operation of law. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// FICER SECTIO To 1. The Senior Civil Judge Markapur Prakasam District, (with records) 2. The Junior Civil Judge Darsi Prakasam District. 3. One CC to SRI. P SRIDHAR REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. MVS SURESH KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 6. THREE CD COPIES TAC HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 JUDGMENT SA NO.820 OF 2002 O 0 9 SEP 2025 B) vO DISMISSING THE SA AS ABATED