Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25680 (KAR)

M R RAMACHANDRAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/9304/2018 · 2025-01-15

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1319 CRL.P No. 9304 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9304 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. M.R. RAMACHANDRAIAH S/O RANGASWAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. 2. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA W/O M.R. RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 3. KIRAN KUMAR R., S/O RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS. ALL ARE R/AT BUS STAND ROAD, NEAR URDU SCHOOL, KYATHASANDRA, TUMAKURU 573 220. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PREMKUMAR C.S., ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KYATHASANDRA POLICE STATION TUMAKURU, REP. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1319 CRL.P No. 9304 of 2018 2. SRI. VEERAPPA M., S/O MUTHYALAPPA E., AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT #51, THIRUMALA IDMT LAYOUT, CAUVERY ROAD, 4TH CROSS, SIRA GATE, TUMAKURU 573 220 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1; SRI. B.A. RAMESH BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 - ABSENT) *** THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC-I, TUMAKURU IN CRIME NO.333/2015 (NOW IN C.C.NO.4463/2018) AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF OR RELIES AS THIS COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES F THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. There is no representation. He has filed a memo in the office, seeking - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1319 CRL.P No. 9304 of 2018 permission to retire from the case. He has enclosed a copy of the legal notice dated 25.10.2024 addressed to the petitioner along with postal receipts for having sent the notice and seeks permission to retire from the case as there is no instruction. 2. The petition is of the year 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to retire from the case. The petitioners are called out. No representation. It appears the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BMV* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4