Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25675 (AP)

RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD, HYD & ANOTHER v. MD, APSPDCL, GUNTUR DIST & 2 OTHERS

WP/6543/2014 · 2025-07-13

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010363862014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6543 OF 2014 Between: 1. RELIANCE COMMUNICATION LTD, HYD & ANOTHER, having its registered office at 'H' Block, Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai - 400 710 and one of its circle offices at Plot No.38, Phase-2, Hitec City, Madhapur, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Legal Coordinator, Mr. K.Ravinder Babu, S/o Late K.B.M.Gupta. 2. Reliance Infratel Limited, having its registered office at 'H' Block, Dhirubhai Ambani Knowledge City, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai - 400 710 and one of its circle offices at Plot No.38, Phase-2, Hitec City, Madhapur, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Legal Coordinator, Mr. K.Ravinder Babu, S/o Late K.B.M.Gupta. ...Petitioners AND 1. MD APSPDCL GUNTUR DIST Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. The Divisional Engineer, The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Tenali, Guntur District. 3. The Tenali Municipality, Rep. by it's Commissioner, Tenali, Guntur District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED Counsel for the Respondents: P A SESHU Counsel for the Respondents:- Counsel for the Respondents:V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR APCPDCL) 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: None present for the Writ Petitioners. 2. Sri Abdul Matheen, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.V. Satish, learned Standing Counsel for APEPDCL appearing for Respondent Nos.1 & 2, on instructions, submits that the electricity connection of the Writ Petitioners have been restored because the Writ Petitioners have already paid the dues. 3. In view of these facts, this Writ Petition does not require any further consideration. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no Order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 14.07.2025 JKS 3 56 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 6543 OF 2014 14.07.2025 JKS