Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25673 (KAR)

SRI. T. THIMMAPPA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/13006/2025 · 2025-04-28

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17493 WP No. 13006 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 13006 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. T. THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, S/O LATE THIRUMALE GOWDA, R/AT KABBALI VILLAGE, HIRISAVE HOBLI, CHANNAAYAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573140. (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN IS NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.S.PARIKSHIT., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001 2. ASST. COMMISSIONER, CHANNARAYAPTNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573116. 3. TAHASILDAR, CHANNARAYAPTNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT-573116 4. BASAVARAJU .K.H., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O LATE K.H. HONNEGOWDA, R/OF KABBALI VILLAGE, DASIHALLI, HIRISAVE HOBLI, CHANNAAYAPATNA TALUK, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17493 WP No. 13006 of 2025 HASSAN DISTRICT-573140 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 10/03/2025 PASSED BY 2ND RESPONDENT IN DISPUTE NO. R.A. 263/24-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ALSO MUTATION ENTERED IN THE NAME OF 4TH RESPONDENT VIDE M.R. NO. 160/2024-2025 DATED 21/03/2025, 162/2024-2025 DATED 25/03/2025 AND 161/2024-2025 DATED 25/03/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F, F1 AND F2 RESPECTIVELY, MADE BY 3RD RESPONDENT, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. As against the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner vide Annexure-E, admittedly the petitioner has the remedy of filing a Revision under Section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short, 'the Act'). 2. In the light of the statutory remedy available to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed . 3. Petitioner is reserved with liberty to avail of the remedy provided under Section 136(3) of the Act - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17493 WP No. 13006 of 2025 against the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner. 4. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE hnm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 86