Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2567 (RAJ)

ABHISHEK MEENA S/O LATE SHRI RAMPRASAD MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/424/2025 · 2025-02-17

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6883] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 424/2025 Abhishek Meena S/o Late Shri Ramprasad Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Siswali, Tehsil Mangrol, District Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. District Education Officer, H. Q. (Secondary) Kota 4. Chief Block Education Officer, Panchayat Samiti Itawa District Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ritesh Kumawat For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the brother of the petitioner, who got compassionate appointment in place their deceased father, had expired on 08.11.2020. It is further submitted that the amendment (w.e.f. 28.10.2021) in the relevant Rules includes 'unmarried brother' in the definition of 'dependent', and despite the said fact the respondents are not granting compassionate appointment to the petitioner. Learned counsel has further placed reliance upon order dated 15.11.2022 passed in Kamlesh Meghwal vs. State of Rajasthan and ors. (SBCWP No. 5590/2022) wherein, similar prayer is allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:6883] (2 of 2) [CW-424/2025] Howsoever, on account of the fact that the existing Rules and the amended rules are to be assailed, learned counsel wants to withdraw the instant petition with the liberty to assail the said Rules before the Division Bench. In view of the above, the instant petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/104