Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25668 (RAJ)

SAYYAD NAJIS ALI @ NAJJU S/O SHRI FAROOK ALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9554/2025 · 2025-08-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30165] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9554/2025 Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Plot No. 249, Krishna Nagar, P.g.b.t. College Ke Pass, Bersiya Road, Bhopal, Thana Gautam Nagar, District Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) (At Presently Confined In District Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali, in FIR No. 299/2025 dated 07.06.2025 registered at P.S. Udhyog Nagar, District Kota whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Section Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali. 2. The applicant- Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali, was arrested and is in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that co-accused Aadi Mohammed Khan has already been allowed bail by Co- ordinate Bench and case of present petitoner is better than Aadi Mohammed Khan. He further submitted that this [2025:RJ-JP:30165] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9554/2025] petitioner accused was neither named in FIR nor by any other person. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Initially, a report was registered by complainant against Samiruddin and Ayaan under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS. During investigation, police has recovered two vehicles at the instance of present petitioner and one at the instance of Aadi Mohammed Khan. Total three criminal cases were registered against the present petitioner. Co-accused Aadi Mohammed Khan was already released on bail in pursuant to order dated 16.07.2025 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case [2025:RJ-JP:30165] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9554/2025] and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, particularly when there were four cases against Aadi Mohammed Khan, therefore, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Sayyad Najis Ali @ Najju S/o Shri Farook Ali,, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ), J CHETNA BEHRANI /377