Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25666 (RAJ)

LAXMINARAYAN @ LACCHU S/O SAJJAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/9733/2025 · 2025-08-07

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30673] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9733/2025 1. Laxminarayan @ Lacchu S/o Sajjan Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Hajdriya Police Station Unhel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 2. Gordhan Alias Gordhar S/o Sajjan Lal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Hajdriya Police Station Unhel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 3. Toofan S/o Ratanlal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Hajdriya Police Station Unhel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) 4. Mukesh S/o Hariram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Hajdriya Police Station Unhel District Jhalawar (Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub-District Jail, Bhawani Mandi District Jhalawar (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Lal Mali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant(s)-accused Laxminarayan @ Lacchu S/o Sajjan Singh, Gordhan Alias Gordhar S/o Sajjan Lal, Toofan S/o Ratanlal and Mukesh S/o Hariram in FIR No. 66/2025 dated 07.05.2025 registered at [2025:RJ-JP:30673] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9733/2025] P.S. Unhel Nageshwar District -Jhalawar, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS and Sections 5 and 27 of Arms Act. 2. The applicants were arrested have in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that the injuries sustained by injured is also not found as dangerous and accused undertakes not to indulge in any criminal activity after being released on bail. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicants-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicants-accused are required for further investigation, the applicants-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor but learned counsel for complainant submits that he has no objection in case bail is granted to the appellant- accused. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-accused, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant. Perused the material placed on record. [2025:RJ-JP:30673] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9733/2025] 6. In impugned order dated 03.06.2025, the Trial Court has noticed that a cross-case has been registered for the incident and parties have compromised the matter. Though, there is criminal antecedent reported against Laxminarayan @ Lacchu S/o Sajjan Singh, Gordhan Alias Gordhar S/o Sajjan Lal, Toofan S/o Ratanlal and Mukesh S/o Harirambut learned counsel for complainant has no objection in grant of bail. Moreover, a Co-ordinate bench has also granted bail to two accused on 24.07.2025 in bail application No. 7569/2025. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and he/they is/are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Laxminarayan @ Lacchu S/o Sajjan Singh, Gordhan Alias Gordhar S/o Sajjan Lal, Toofan S/o Ratanlal and Mukesh S/o Hariram, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2025:RJ-JP:30673] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9733/2025] (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ),J MONU /293