SAMBHAJI SHIVAJI PAWAR AND ORS v. YAMAIDEVI URUN ISLAMPUR THR POA HOLDER MADHUKAR NANA GURAV SINCE DEC THR LRS
WP/2524/2025 · 2026-06-25
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2566 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2566 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
47-WP-3395-2025 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3395 OF 2025 Pundlik Pandurang Gondkar And Anr ...Petitioners Versus Yamaidevi Uran Islampur Throu. Poa Since Decd Throu. L.h ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2525 OF 2025 Chandrakant Alias Ramchandra Gunhari Patil ...Petitioner Versus Yamaidevi Urun Islampur Thr Poa Madhukar Nana Gurav Since Dec Thr Lrs ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2524 OF 2025 Sambhaji Shivaji Pawar And Ors ...Petitioners Versus Yamaidevi Urun Islampur Thr Poa Holder Madhukar Nana Gurav Since Dec Thr Lrs ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2523 OF 2025 Ravindra Netaji Holkar And Ors ...Petitioners Versus Yamaidevi Urun Islampur Thr Poa Madhukar Nana Gurav Since Dec Thr Lrs ...Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3394 OF 2025 ZIP 1 of 3
47-WP-3395-2025 (C).doc Kalavati Pralhad Pore And Ors ...Petitioners Versus Yamaidevi Urun Islampur Thr. Poa Madhukar N. Gurav Since Decd. Thr. Lrs ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 580 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3395 OF 2025 Yamaidevi Uran Islampur Throu. Poa Since Decd Throu. L.h ...Applicants Versus Pundlik Pandurang Gondkar And Anr ...Respondents ….. Adv. Swapnil Lokare, Advocate for Applicants. Mr. Nikhil Pawar, Advocate for Petitioners. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 25th JUNE, 2026.
P.C. : Both the learned counsel are unanimous that the appeals preferred by the petitioners against the judgment and decree passed by the Trial Court have been finally decided by the lower Appellate Court vide judgment dated 13.01.2026. The lower Appellate Court remanded the matters to Trial Court for deciding the matters afresh on their own merits. In these supervening events, nothing survives in the writ petitions. The interim orders which are under challenge have merged in the final judgment.
2. The writ petitions are disposed of. ZIP 2 of 3
47-WP-3395-2025 (C).doc
3. In view of disposal of writ petitions, pending interim applications also stands disposed of.
4. Parties shall be at liberty to agitate their claim in respect of the amount deposited in the lower Appellate Court or transferred to the Trial Court as is permissible in law.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME] ZIP 3 of 3