[2025:RJ-JP:33090] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9492/2025 Buddhiram S/o Ramsahai, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sevti Kalan, Police Station Baharawanda Kalan, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.54/2025 registered at Police Station Bharawanda Kalan, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short, ‘BNS’), 2023. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 & 118(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that cross cases have been registered between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel argues that petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:33090] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9492/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that cross cases have been registered between the parties, as also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this bail application. 6. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Buddhiram S/o Ramsahai, shall be released on bail provided, he shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /152