IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13215 of 2024 Date of Decision: 03.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Govinder Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 4. Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that on account of subsequent development, whereby NOC issued in favour of respondent No.5 has been withdrawn, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Needless to say, respondent No.5 is always at liberty to lay challenge the order, thereby NOC granted in his favour has been withdrawn. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 03, 2025 (shankar)