BHANWAR SINGH ANDORS v. STATE REVENU DEPARTMENTANR
CW/1851/2016 · 2025-02-21
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25656 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:8032] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1851/2016
1. Bhanwar Singh S/o Chotu
2. Bhag Chand S/o Chotu (deceased) 2/1. Shanti Devi wife of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/2. Seema Daughter of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/3. Rekha Daughter of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/4. Suman Daughter of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/5. Sunita Daughter of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/6. Tarun son of Late Shri Bhag Chand 2/1 to 2/6 All resident of behind Hotel Mansingh, Sagar Vihar, in front of L-28, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer.
3. Suresh S/o Chotu
4. Kailash S/o Chotu
5. Bhanwari D/o Chotu
6. Braji Devi W/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
7. Karan Singh S/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
8. Sheela D/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
9. Surendra S/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
10. Mahendra S/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
11. Dilip Singh S/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh
12. Ava W/o Late Shri Shayar
13. Dinesh S/o Late Shri Shayar, minor through natural guardian mother Ava
14. Asha D/o Late Shri Shayar, minor through natural guardian mother Ava
15. Tauli Devi W/o Late Chotu Singh All Resident of Behind Hotel Mansingh, Sagar Vihar, in front of L- 28, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. Authorized Officer, Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer
3. Land Acquisition Officer, Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Bhati for Mr. Rakesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Sharma Mr. Javed Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 21/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions of petitioners, submits that petitioners do not want to pursue the writ
[2025:RJ-JP:8032] (2 of 2) [CW-1851/2016] petition, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Respondents have no objection to the same.
3. In view of above, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Application (1/2025) for withdrawal of the writ petition stand
disposed of, accordingly.
5. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /100