Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25655 (RAJ)

RAMESHWAR PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/18349/2016 · 2025-03-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18349/2016 Rameshwar Prasad Yadav S/o Ram Sahai, Village Indokiya, Post Bambori, Tehsil Jhotwara, District Jaipur At Present Working As Painter- Helper Grade -Ii In The Office Of Assistant Engineer, P.w.d. Sub-Division-I, Civil Lines, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Public Works Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Chief Engineer H.q. Cum Additional, Secretary, P.w.d., P.w.d. Building Jacab Road, Jaipur 3. Chief Engineer, Road, P.w.d., P.w.d. Building Jacab Road, Jaipur 4. Additional Chief Engineer, Zone-I, P.w.d., P.w.d. Building Jacab Road, Jaipur 5. Superintending Engineer, City Circle,p.w.d., P.w.d. Building Jacab Road, Jaipur 6. Executive Engineer, City Division-Ii, P.w.d., P.w.d. Building Jacab Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Sharma for Mr. Sharad Joshi, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/03/2025 None has marked presence qua the petitioner. The matter pertains to the year 2016. Upon a perusal of the petition, it is noted that the petitioner has sent a legal notice for demand of justice dated 20.07.2016 to the respondents through his counsel, for granting him status of [2025:RJ-JP:13760] (2 of 2) [CW-18349/2016] Painter Grade-II, from the date of declaring him as Semi Permanent i.e. 12.08.1983. It is further noted that the said representation/legal notice has not been adjudicated. In the facts and circumstances, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that the said representation or any fresh representation, if filed, within a period of fortnight from the date of passing of this order, will be considered by the respondents, within an upper limit of thirty days thereafter. Considering the averments made by the learned counsel for the respondents, it is directed that the legal notice for demand of justice dated 20.07.2016 or any other fresh representation filed by the petitioner, shall be considered by the respondents within the period noted herein above, in light of judgment encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ- JP:5792) by way of a speaking order. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/209