LEELARAM S/O LATE SHRI LALLURAM (WRONGLY MENTIONED AS LACHURAM) v. HANUMAN S/O CHANDER
CFA/773/2019 · 2025-02-11
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5930] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 773/2019
1. Leelaram S/o Late Shri Lalluram (Wrongly Mentioned As Lachuram), Aged About 37 Years, B/c Bramin, R/o Duhar Chogan, Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar (Raj.)
2. Rajesh S/o Lalluram, Aged About 33 Years, B/c Bramin, R/o Duhar Chogan, Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus Hanuman S/o Chander, Aged About 47 Years, B/c Bramin, R/o Duhar Chogan, Tehsil Thanagaji, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order 11/02/2025
Learned counsel for the appellant(s) as well as learned counsel for the respondent(s) submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties. The appellant has paid Rs.2,50,000/- to the respondent. So, the judgment and decree dated 22.05.2019 passed by the trial court be set aside. So, the present appeal stands disposed of. The judgment and decree dated 22.05.2019 passed by the trial court is set aside. Decree be drawn accordingly. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to issue a certificate to the appellant authorizing him to get the court fee refunded from the Collector (Stamps).
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J AVINASH GULERIA /84