ROYALU RAM v. THE HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
CWP/15403/2024 · 2025-01-08
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25651 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25651 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 15403 of 2024
Decided on: 08.01.2025 Royalu Ram
… Petitioner
Versus
The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd
… Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Om Parkash Goel, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mrs. Maheshwari Sharma, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that retiral benefits, as stand spelled out in the writ petition, have not been paid to him after his retirement.
2.
Learned Counsel for the respondent-Corporation submits that some reasonable time be granted to the respondents to do the needful.
3.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that let all the emoluments as are due to the petitioner be paid to him within a period of three months from today alongwith statutory interest as well as other interest prayed for from the date of filing of the writ petition. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge January 08, 2025 (narender)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?