Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25648 (CHH)

MUKESH KUMAR NISHAD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1789/2025 · 2025-06-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24701 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1789 of 2025 Mukesh Kumar Nishad S/o Dhaniram Nishad, Aged About 20 Years R/o Village- Hardi, P.S.-Chura, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Chura, District- Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent For petitioner : None For respondent /State : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 16.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 23.07.2024, passed in MCRC No. 5057 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the petitioner, namely, Mukesh Kumar Nishad, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on two occasions also, this Court had granted extension of time VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2025.06.17 19:45:34 +0530 2 for compliance of the order dated 23.07.2024. 4. The learned Sessions Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Raipur, District – Raipur, (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 26.05.2025 has requested for grant of six month more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in the present case, it is requested that as per the order of Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur's CRMP No. 467/2025 dated 05.02.2025, the case is to be resolved within 04 months. Till date, the statement of a total of 09 prosecution witnesses has been recorded in the case and 03 witnesses are yet to be examined. Full efforts are being made to resolve the case. Due to this reason, it is not possible to conclude the trial within the time prescribed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of three months more time for concluding the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of six months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav