IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14945 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Rajeev Kumar & Ors. …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ….Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide representations of the petitioners dated 31.08.2025 (Annexure P-3 Colly.) in light of judgment dated 21.03.2024 (Annexure P-1), in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide representations of the petitioners in light of aforesaid judgment expeditiously, preferably within a period of three weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass a speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 16, 2025 (Shamsh Tabrez)