Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25645 (DEL)

MASIHUDIN KHAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

W.P.(C)/11062/2025 · 2025-07-29

C Hari Shankar, Om Prakash Shukla

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(C) 11062/2025 $~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11062/2025 & CM APPL. 45507/2025 MASIHUDIN KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Sheel, Ms. Deepshikha and Mr. Anshul Mahajan, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant N Goyal, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Mr. Arun Kumar Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 29.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that he has been posted in Leh at an altitude of 11,500 ft. despite the fact that he suffers from medical conditions in which even as per the report of the respondents themselves, he is not fit for being posted in high altitude areas above 9,000 ft. 2. With consent of parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and to pass a speaking and reasoned order thereon, addressing all the issues raised in the writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today. In case the decision is adverse to the Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:30.07.2025 16:24:50 Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 11062/2025 petitioner, its operation would remain suspended for a period of one week in order to enable the petitioner to avail legal remedies, if so advised. 3. Needless to say, till that time, the petitioner would not be required to conform to the order of posting at Leh. 4. The petition stands allowed to the aforesaid extent. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J JULY 29, 2025 AR Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:30.07.2025 16:24:50