Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25640 (RAJ)

NARPAT SINGH VERMA S/O SH. DURGPAL SINGH v. ARTI DOGRA

CCP/754/2025 · 2025-09-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38639] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 754/2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3083/2025 Narpat Singh Verma S/o Sh. Durgpal Singh, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Vikas Nagar, Behind Pani Ki Tanki, Near Rbm Hospital, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Arti Dogra, The Managing Director, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd, Head Office, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur- 302005. 2. Hari Bhushan Bhatia, The Chief Personnel Officer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Head Office, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur-302005. 3. Janak Lal Meena, The Assistant Engineer, Jvvnl, Roopwas, District-Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/09/2025 1. Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat, learned counsel puts appearance on behalf of the respondents. 2. This contempt petition has been by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order dated 03.03.2025 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3083/2025. 3. Heard. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the respective parties. [2025:RJ-JP:38639] (2 of 2) [CCP-754/2025] 4. Vide order dated 03.03.2025, the Court had directed the respondents-authorities to adjudicate the legal issue of demand of justice as well as representation filed by the petitioner within a period of 30 days. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the respondents-authorities have already considered the representation of the petitioner and the same has been decided by reasoned and speaking order on 09.04.2025. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this contempt petition may be disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to raise his all remaining grievances by availing appropriate remedy available to him under law. 7. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. 8. Notices stand discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /142