Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2564 (AP)

Gutha Venkateswara Prasad v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/279/2021 · 2025-01-30

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010004212021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Gutha Venkateswara Prasad State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BALAIAH B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 279/2021 Gutha Venkateswara Prasad ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders, if any, shall stand vacated. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR