Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25638 (PNJ)

SATISH KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CWP/16/2001 · 2025-07-04

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-16-2001 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 204 CWP-16-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 04.07.2025 Satish Kumar …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Rohit Arya, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana Mr. Ashwani Bakshi, Advocate for respondent no.4 Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.5/UGC TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed against the refusal to approve the petitioner’s appointment as Lecturer Social Studies in the College run by the fourth respondent/Management. 2. At the time of issuing notice of motion, vide order dated 04.01.2001, it was ordered that the petitioner’s services would not be terminated till further orders. He continued in service and, as per learned counsel for the petitioner, has superannuated therefrom. He availed one year extension in service as well. Since the petitioner continued in service on the basis of an interim order granted by this Court and retired on attaining the age of superannuation, it goes without saying, he will be entitled to all benefits for the service rendered, in accordance with law. PAYAL 2025.07.09 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16-2001 (O&M) -2- 3. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of 4. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 04.07.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.07.09 09:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document