[2025:RJ-JP:34552] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11981/2025 1. Preeti Parmar D/o Shri Rajendra Prasad, R/o Shivnagar, Pokhra Colony, P.s. Nihalganj, District Dholpur. 2. Mamta Meena D/o Shri Bhagwanadas Mean, R/o Badagaon, Chandpura, P.s. Sarmathura, District Dholpur. 3. Yogesh Kumari D/o Shri Dharam Singh, R/o Chakbaltikari, P.S. Chiksana, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur, 302007 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. (Raj.) Pin Code 302015 3. The Inspector General Of Police, (Bharatpur Range), Ig Office Bharatpur (Raj.) Pin Code 321001 4. The District Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur District, 328001 5. The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur District, 3280001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Singh Mr. Prem Chand Dewanda For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 29/08/2025 1. Petitioners have filed the instant writ petition with following prayers:- "In view of the foregoing facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: a. Issue a writ, direction, or order setting aside the impugned order no. 183/2017 dated 11.05.2017 passed by Superintendent of Police, Dholpur and [2025:RJ-JP:34552] (2 of 2) [CW-11981/2025] restoring all consequential benefits as if petitioners were made permanent w.e.f. 14.05.2017. b. Issue a writ, direction, or order directing respondent to give increment dated 01.07.2017 with all Consequentail Benefits which was given to all other recruit constable appointed as probationer-trainees alongside the petitioners. c. Pass any other order that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice." 2. In order to challenge order dated 11.05.2017 passed by the Superintendent of Police, Dholpur with regard to probation period of the petitioners, the petitioners have approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition on 21.07.2025 i.e. after a delay of around 8 years and no explanation whatsoever has been given in the entire writ petition for approaching this Court after such a long delay. 3. It is settled proposition of law that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is an equitable jurisdiction and cannot be exercised in favour of person(s) who was not diligent about his/her/their rights. 4. In view of above, writ petition is suffering from the vice of delay and latches, there is no scope for interference in the matter. Hence, writ petition filed by the petitioners is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /2