RAVURU HARSHA REDDY v. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/4063/2025 · 2025-02-18
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25632 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25632 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP NO. 4063 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-02-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP NO. 4063 of 2025 Ravuru Harsha Reddy S/o.Harindra Nadh Reddy, Mamidipudi Village, Metthukuru, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh-524346. Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Pennalurpet Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No. 35 of 2025 Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.Arivazhagan C For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) r/w Section 21(1) of TNMMDR Act in Crime No.35 of 2025 , on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the first accused, Driver of the vehicle was found illegally transporting 6 units of savudu sand. Hence, the case. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP NO. 4063 of 2025
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent; that he has been falsely implicated in this case; that he is the owner of the lorry and the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions submitted that there is no previous case as against the petitioner. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and also perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the submissions made by either side; nature of allegations; that the contraband was seized; that the co-accused was arrested and released on bail and since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: (a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP NO.
4063 of 2025 of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Uthukkottai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. 18.02.2025 vca SUNDER MOHAN,J. Vca 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP NO. 4063 of 2025 To, The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Pennalurpet Police Station, Thiruvallur District. Crime No. 35 of 2025 CRL OP NO. 4063 of 2025 18.02.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis