APHC010361852020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 24083/2020 Between: 1. DUNGALA RAMANA,, S/O YERRI NAIDU, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O H.NO.5-167, THANARN, PARAVADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. KAKARA SRINU,, , S/O PARADESI, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O KATTAVANI PALEM, BHARANIKAM POST, PARAVADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ASSIGNMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, PARAVADA MANDAL, PARAVADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action on the part of the respondents particularly the respondents 2 to 4 in proposing to allot house site pattas in KONDA PORAMBOKE lands which arc having rich/rare mineral wealth covered by Sy.Nos. 1 and 11 of Paravada Village, Paravada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District under the scheme NAVARATNALU- PEDALANDARIKI ILLU contrary to G.O.Ms.No.74, Industries and Commerce (MI) Department, dated 16-02-2002, without even considering the objections raised by thepetitioners and others, as illegal, arbitrary, ultra virus, unjust against the procedure laid down in the Board standing orders and against the principles of natural justice and to consequently direct the respondents not to allot house site pattas in the above said KONDA PORAMBOKE lands in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue an interim direction against the respondents not to allot house site pattas under the scheme "NAVARATNALU-PEDALANDARIKI ILLU" in "KONDA PORAMBOKE" lands covered by Sy.Nos. 1 and 11 of Parravada Village, Paravada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, during the pendency of this writ petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents particularly the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in proposing to allot house site pattas in ‘Konda Poramboke’ lands which are having rich/rare mineral wealth covered by Sy.Nos.1 and 11 of Paravada Village, Paravada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District under the scheme of Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu contrary to the G.O.Ms.No.74, Industries & Commerce (MI) Department, dated 16.02.2002 without even considering the objections raised by the petitioners and others. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents submits that the respondent Nos.2 to 4 will follow the due procedure in respect of the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in the said survey numbers of the said village strictly in accordance with law. The objections of the petitioners if any made afresh, shall be considered and disposed of by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible. 4 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.09.2025 NNN