[2025:RJ-JP:39710] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11154/2025 Satvir Singh S/o Shri Narayan Singh, aged about 50 Years, R/o Village & Post Kolida, VIA Kudan, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Presently working on the post of Physical Teacher Grade-II at Seth J.P. Goyanka Govt. Senior Secondary School, Dharamshala Beri, Piparli, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Chief Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Secondary Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director Of Secondary Education, Department of Education, Bikaner (Raj.) 4. Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Division Jaipur, District Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 26/09/2025 1. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is per- mitted to file a representation before respondent No.4- Deputy Di- rector, Secondary Education, Division Jaipur, District Jaipur, Rajasthan, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of four (04) weeks from today; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.4 to decide the same in a time-bound manner in light of the judgment passed by a Single Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, in the matter of [2025:RJ-JP:39710] (2 of 2) [CW-11154/2025] Bhagwan Swaroop Pathak & Ors. Vs. The Director, Secondary Education & Ors.1. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.4 within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.4 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of filing of such representation in light of the judgment passed in Bhagwan Swaroop Pathak (supra), by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner's grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-10 1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4001/2020, decided on 13.08.2020