Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25624 (RAJ)

HARLAL S/O LATE SHRI NARAYAN MEENA. v. SURGYAN SINGH S/O RAMPRATAP

CMA/3348/2018 · 2025-05-08

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19470] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3348/2018 1. Harlal S/o Late Shri Narayan Meena., Aged About 58 Years, R/o Dhani Chokdiya, Village Chareda, Tehsil Nagal Rajawatan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 2. Smt. Bholi W/o Late Shri Harlal Meena, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Dhani Chokdiya, Village Chareda, Tehsil Nagal Rajawatan, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Appellants Versus 1. Surgyan Singh S/o Rampratap, R/o Village Badh Mohchingpura, Police Station, Sikandra, Teh. Sikari, Distt. Dausa (Driver) 2. Suresh Rajawat S/o Narpat Singh Rajawat, R/o House No.87, Mohalla Rajputana, Bhuritiya Police Station Niwai, District Tonk (Owner) 3. Universal Sampo General Insurance Company Limited., Through Branch Manager, Branch Office, Registeres And Corporate Office, Unit 401, Fourth Floor, Sangam Complex, Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai, 400059 (Insurance Company) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ramdeo Arya for Mr. Sandesh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/05/2025 1. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been filed by the applicant for condonation of delay of one hundred fifty seven (157) days’ in filing the present appeal. 2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.04.2024 allowed the application for condonation of delay in [2025:RJ-JP:19470] (2 of 2) [CMA-3348/2018] filing the civil misc. appeal subject to deposition of cost of Rs.2,000/- by the appellants with the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority and on filing a receipt thereof in the registry within three weeks. 3. As per the Office report, no any receipt with regard to deposition the cost as ordered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has been submitted by the appellants. The delay was condoned subject to deposition of Cost of Rs.2,000/- and submitting the receipt with regard to same. 4. Since, the appellants have not deposited the cost and the receipt of the same within the given time, the present civil misc. appeal is dismissed as being time barred. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /29