Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25622 (PNJ)

M/S GIRJA SHANKAR AND SONS AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/6200/2025 · 2025-04-02

Sudhir Singh, Sukhvinder Kaur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-6200-2025 (O&M) - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-6200-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.04.2025 M/S GIRJA SHANKAR AND SONS AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present : Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Aman Bahri, Additional A.G, Haryana. SUDHIR SINGH . J.(Oral) Present writ petition herein, inter alia is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the cases/entitlement of the petitioners for allotment of plot on reserve price being old licensees of category (ii) under the Haryana State Agricultural Marketing Board (Sale of Immovable Property) Rules, 2000’, as the petitioners had made number of requests from time to time. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners would be satisfied, in case, their pending representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) is decided by respondent No.2, expeditiously, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.04.20 01:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CWP-6200-2025 (O&M) - 2- grievance of the petitioners will be looked into by respondent No.2 and it shall take decision either way, on pending representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) of the petitioners. 4. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider pending representation dated 04.11.2024 (Annexure P-8) of the petitioners, after affording an opportunity of personal hearing, and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 02.04.2025 amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.04.20 01:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment