Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010362162019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3255 OF 2019 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders passed in lA No.64 of 2019 in OS No.36 of 2013 dated 18.07.2019 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor. Between:
1. G. Seshachalam, S/o G. Chegama Naidu, Hindu, Aged about 67 years, business, residing at D. No. 2-734/1, Santhinagar Colony, Chittoor Town, Post Mandal and District. 2. Smt. G. Sankarama, W/o G. Seshachalam, Hindu, Aged about 57 years, housewife, residing at D.No. 2-734/1, Santhinagar Colony, Chittoor Town, Post Mandal and District ...Petitioners/Defendants 4 & 5 AND
1. Smt. V.Krishnamma, W/o V. Durvasulu Naidu, Hindu, aged about 72 years. Housewife, residing at Mogili Village, Mogili Mittor Post, Bangarupalyam Mandal, Chittoor District. 2. Sri D.Venkatadri Naidu, S/o Late D. Lakshmaiah Naidu, Hindu, aged about 61 years, business, R/o D.No. 20-23/2, Naidu Buildings, Mittoor, Chittoor. Respondents (Respondents/Plaintiff & 1®* Defendant)
3. D Sujith, S/o. D. Venkatadri Naidu, aged about 27 years. Student, R/o D.No. 20-23/2, Naidu Buildings, Mittoor, Chittoor. 4. D Mounica, D/o D.Venkatadri Naidu, Hindu, aged about 28 years, R/o D.No. 20-23/2, Naidu Buildings, Mittoor, Chittoor. 5. C Sudhakar Reddy, S/o Late C. Jayarama Reddy, Hindu, aged about 45 years, cultivation, R/o Mainagundlepalle Village, K. Patnam Post, Thavanampalle Mandal, Chittoor District. 6. M Thulasi Venkataramana, S/o Late Dr. Narasimha Reddy, Hindu, aged about 30 years, engineer, residing at C/o V. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, 30 East Road, West CT1 Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai-35, Tamil Nadu. 7. Dr.M.Lathish, S/o Late Dr. Narasimha Reddy, aged about 44 years. Doctor, permanent resident of B.V. Reddy Colony, Chittoor Town and District, at present residing at Plot No.502, Gr and Apartment, II Line, Vidya Nagar, Near Saibaba Temple, Guntur Town and District. ...Respondents Respondents/Defendants 2 to 7) (Respondents Nos. 3 to 7 not necessary parties) lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S. No. 36/2013 on the file of the Court of the VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor.
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, Advocate Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri I Munniraja, Advocate The Court made the following order:
APHC010362162019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY .THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3255/2019 Between; ...PETITIONER(S) G Seshachalam and Others AND ...RESPONDENT{S) V Krishnamma and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.1 MUNNIRAJA The Court made the following: i
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY C.R.P.No.3255 of 2019
ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing,
learned counsel for the Petitioner(s) represented that in the light of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Civil Revision Petition has been rendered infructuous and as
1. such, no further orders are necessary in this Petition.
2. Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECmfNOFFICER //TRUE COPY// To
1. The VIII Additional District Judge, Chittoor.
2. One CC to Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri I Munniraja, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Three CD Copies GPC nm
\ HIGH COURT DATED: 25/06/2025 i I 3 I
ORDER CRP NO. 3255 OF 2019 o\ g 25SEf‘?ll25 m,s , Current sieciion 5;5;£^PATCV^^^ DISMISSING THIS CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS i jj I Si