IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT APPEAL NOS: 12. 13.14.15.16 & 17 OF 2015 CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 12 OF 201 fi Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge dated 10/07/2015 made in C.C. No. 1931 of 2014. Between: J.C. Sarma, Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...Appellant (Respondent No.1) AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, (Regd.No.212/2011) Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, rep. by its General Secretary A.Narasimharao, s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 2. A.Narasimha Rao, S/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. years, resident of years, resident of ...Respondents/Petitioners 3. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 4. Mr.G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endow-ments, Kakinada, East Godavari district. 5. Mr. Satyanarayana, Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Eluru, W.G. district. 6. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/o Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. 7. K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Dept., T.P. Gudem,. W.G. district. Department, ...Respondents 3 to 7/Respondents 2 to 6 I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL. NO: 902 OF 2015^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the Order made in CC.No.1931 of 2014 dated 10.07.2015, in so far as the petitioner/Appellant is concerned, pending disposal of the above Contempt Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Advocate General (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 13 OF 2015 Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt nf Courts Act, aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge dated 10/07/2015 made in C.C. No. 1931 of 2014. 3 Between: Ms.Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. ...Appellant/Respondent No.2 AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, (Regd.No.212/2011), Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, rep. by its General Secretary, A.Narasinnharao s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, resident of Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 2. A.Narasimha Rao, s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, resident of Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. ...Respondents/Petitioners 3. Mr.C.S. Sarma, PrI. Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Mr.G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, East Godavari district. 5. Mr. Satyanarayana, Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, W.G. district. 6. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/O Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. 7. Mr.K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Dept., T.P. Gudem, W.G. district. ...Respondents (Respondents 1,3,4,5,6) M j.A. NO: 1 OF 2015/APPL. NO: 903 OF 2Q1fi) Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated 10.07.2015 pending disposal of the Contempt Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Advocate General (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy praying that in the circumstances m support of the petition, the High Court may be made in C.C.No.1931/20104 in so far as the Petitioner/Appellant is concerned CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 14 OF 201 Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge dated 10/07/2015 in C.C. No. 1931 of 2014. made Between: Mr.Satyanarayana Department, Eluru, West Godavari District. Assistant Commissioner of Endowments ...Appellant (Respondent No.4) AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District A.Narasimharao s/o Simhachalam Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 2. A.Narasimha Rao, s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem (Regd.No.212/2011), rep. by its General Secretary, Aged 49 years, resident of years, resident of ...Respondents/Petitioners 5 3. C.S. Sarma, PrI. Secretary, Endowments Department, buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 5. Mr.G. Suribabu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada district. 6. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/o Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. 7. K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Dept., T.P. Gudem,. W.G. district. Secretariat Govt, of E.G. ...Respondents 3 to 7/Respondents 1 to 3, 5 to 6 j.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fAPPL. NO: 904 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the Order made in CC.No.1931 of 2014 dated 10.07.2015, in so far as the petitioner/Appellant is concerned, pending disposal of the above Contempt Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Advocate General (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 15 OF 2015 Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge dated 10/07/2015 in C.C. No. 1931 of 2014. made "N Between: Mr.G.Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Department, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ...Appellant (Respondent No.3) AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, (Regd.No.212/2011), Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, rep. by its General Secretary, A.Narasimharao s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, resident of Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 2. A.Narasimha Rao, S/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. years, resident of ...Respondents/Petitioners 3. C.S. Sarma, PrI. Secretary, Endowments Department, buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt. Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 5. Mr. Satyanarayana, Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, W.G. district. 6. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/O Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. 7. K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Dept., T P. Gudem,. W.G. district. Secretariat of ...Respondents 3 to 7/Respondents 1,2, 4 to 6 (Respondent Nos.3 to R7 herein are not necessary parties to this Contempt Appeal) I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL. NO: 905 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the Order made in CC.No.1931 of 2014 dated 10.07.2015, in so far as the petitioner/Appellant is concerned, pending disposal of the above Contempt Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant; Advocate General (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 16 OF 2015 Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge dated 10/07/2015 made in C.C. No. 1931 of 2014. Between: Mr.K.V.Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Department, T.P.Gudem West Godavari District. ...Appellant (Respondent No.6) AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, (Regd.No.212/2011), Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, rep. by its General Secretary, A.Narasimharao s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem years, resident of g 2. A.Narasimha Rao, S/o Simhachalam, Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre. Tadepalligudem. Aged 49 years, resident of ...Respondents/Petitioners 3. Mr.C.S. Sarma, PrI. Secretary, Endowments Department buildings, Hyderabad. 4. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 5. Mr.G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner East Godavari district. 6. Mr. Satyanarayana, Asst. Commissioner, Eluru, W.G. district. . Secretariat Department, Govt, of of Endowments, Kakinada, Endowments Department 7. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/O Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. ...Respondents (Respondents 1 to 5) (Respondent Nos.3 to R7 herein Contempt Appeal) LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL. NO: 906 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the operation of the Order made in CC. No. 1931 of 2014 dated 10.07.2015, in so far as the petitioner/Appellant is concerned, pending disposal of the above Contempt Appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Advocate General Counsel for the Respondents: Sri K S Murthy are not necessary parties to this (AP) CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 17 OF 2015 Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, aggrieved by the common order dated 10/07/2015 passed in WP,No.26700 of 2014 and CC.No.1931 of 2014 by the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh in allowing the Contempt Case No.1931 of 2014 and sentencing the appellant herein to simple imprisonment for a period of three months and also to pay a fine Rs.1500/-, the above named appellant begs to present this memorandum of Contempt Appeal. Between; Srirangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. Satyanarayana, aged about 32 Occ: Ex-Single Trustee of Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. years, R/o. ...Appellant (Respondent No.5) AND 1. Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, (Regd.No.212/2011), Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, Rep; by its General Secretary, A.Narasimharao, S/o. Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, R/o. Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 2. A.Narasimharao, S/o. Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, R/o. Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. ...Respondents/Petitioners 3. Mr. C.S. Sarma, Principal Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 4. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 5. Mr.G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Department, Kakinada, East Godavari district. 6. Mr. Satyanarayana, Assistant Com.missioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, West Godavari district. Rarpana, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District 7. Mr. K.V. Inspector of Endowments Department ...Respondents/Respondents I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fAPPL. NO: 909 OF 2015t Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 10.07.2015 passed in C.C.No. 1931 of 2014, pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Bala Mohan Rao S Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Endowments (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Sri Nagaraju Nagu The Court made the following: ru APHC010373632015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3508] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R f^AGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT APPEALS Nos: 12. 13. 14. 15.16 & 17 of 2015 CONTEMPT APPEAL NO: 12/2015 Between; Principal Secretary, ...APPLICANT AND Sri Baigsulamma Thai Temple Committee and Others Counsel for the Applicant: 1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.KSMURTHY ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 The Court made the following Common Judgment: (perHon'ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan RaoJ As all these Contempt Appeals arise out of a Common Order, they are being disposed of by way of this Common Judgment. 2. The respondents 1 & 2 in these Contempt Appeals were the Writ Petitioners, in W.P.No.26700 of 2014. 3. The Writ Petitioners, who are managing the affairs of Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple located in Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, had approached the erstwhile High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, with the complaint that the respondents in the Writ Petition, were seeking to take over 2 the temple with following the procedure set out under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable & Hindu Religious Institutions & Endowments Act, 1987 [for short the Lndowments Act, 198/”]. A Learned Single Judge, of the erstwhile High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, by his Order dated 11.09.2014, had granted interim direction as prayed for in the case. The interim prayer sought by the Writ Petitioners was a direction to the respondents therein to restrain them from conducting affairs of the temple including opening of the Annadanam Hundi, apart from suspending the proceedings, dated 27.06.2014 and other consequential proceedings. It may be noted that the proceedings mentioned in the prayer related to the publication, under Section 6(c)(ii) of the Endowments Act, 1987,notifying the temple as a temple registered under the Endowments Act, 1987. Thereafter, the respondents in the Writ Petition filed a vacate 4. petition and the matter was heard and finally allowed. By an Order, dated 10.07.2015, the Learned Single Judge set aside all the Orders under which the temple was notified as well as the appointment of the 6**^ respondent therein as the trustee of the temple. 5. While the Writ Petition was pending, the respondents 1 & 2 herein, filed Contempt Case No.1931 of 2014, on the ground that the respondents therein, who are now the appellants in the present set of Contempt Appeals, had deliberately violated the Orders of the Court, dated 11.09.2014, it was the case of the respondents 1 & 2 herein, that despite the 3 Order of the Court, dated 11.09.2014, passed in the presence of the counsel of the appellants herein, there was deliberate violation of the Orders of the Court. It was contended that despite the Orders of the Court, the appellants herein had deliberately refused to either receive the Orders of the Court or to comply with the said Orders by handing over management of the temple back to the 2"^^ respondent herein. The respondents 6 & 7, who are appellants, in C.A.Nos.16 &17 of 2015, had filed counter affidavits contending that there was no violation of the directions of the Court and steps were taken to comply with the directions of the Court. The Learned Single Judge passed a Common Order, in both 6. W.P.No.26700 of 2014 and C.C.No.1931 of 2014, on 10.07.2015. The Learned Single Judge after hearing both sides and after noticing the fact that the copy of the Orders was not received by these respondents, despite the said Orders being dispatched by Registered Post Acknowledge Due and keeping in view the conduct of the 6*^ respondent, in mobilizing people to oppose the Orders of the Court and to browbeat the Writ Petitioner No.2 had held that all the respondents were guilty of the violating the Orders of the Court and sentenced the respondents 1 to 4 & 6, in the Contempt Case, a fine of Rs.1,500/- each. While sentencing the 5*^ respondent therein to simple imprisonment for a period of three months. Aggrieved by these Orders, the respondents in the Contempt Case have filed the present set of Contempt Appeals. The details of the appellants and the Contempt Appeals are set out below:- 7. 4 S Contempt Appeal No. Contempt Case and Writ Petition No and date of Common Order Writ Petition No and date of Order Appellant Name N 0 C.A. No.12of W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014, dated 11.9.2014 Mr. J. C. Sharma, Principle Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh. 1 2015 C.A.No.13of 2015 W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014, dated 11.9.2014 2 C.A.No.14 of W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014, dated 11.9.2014 Mr. Satyanarayana, Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, West Godavari District. 3 2015 W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014 dated 11.9.2014 Mr. G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kakinada, East Godavari District. C.A.No.15of 4 2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014, dated 11.9.2014 Mr. K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Department, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. C.A.No.16of W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 5 2015 W.P.No.26700 of 2014 & C.C.No.1931 of 2014 Dated 10.07.2015 W.P.MP.No.3380 of 2014 In W.P.No.26700 of 2014, dated 11.9.2014 Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, Ex- Single Trustee - Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. C.A.No.17of 6 2015 Heard Learned Government Pleader appearing in the office of the 8. Learned Advocate General for the appellants and Sri K.S. Murthy, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents in the Contempt Appeals. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 'I would 9. contend that they were unaware of the Orders as well as the violation of the Orders. Learned counsel for the respondents would contend that the Learned Single Judge except holding that they were aware of the Orders of the Court, 5 had not given any finding as to how they were guilty of deliberate or willful violation of the Orders of the Court. As far as, the 5*'^ respondent is concerned, the learned counsel appearing for the 5^^ respondent, in the Contempt Case, would contend that the 5*^ respondent had resigned, in March-2015 and had handed over management of the temple back to the Writ Petitioner No.2 and as such, had complied with the directions of the Court. He would contend that the slight delay in complying with the directions of the Court may be condoned. 10. A perusal of the Crders of the Learned Single Judge would show that the Learned Single Judge has meticulously gone through the facts of the case and the conduct of the respondents 5 & 0 in the Contempt Case. The findings of the Learned Single Judge that the respondents 5 & 6 had deliberately refused to receive the Crders of the Court, by locking the premises, where the notices were to be served, had not really been assailed by the respondents 5 & 6. The fact that the 5*^ respondent, in the Contempt Case, had not resigned till March-2015, despite the knowledge of the Crders of the Court, is sufficient to hold that the 5^*^ respondent, in the Contempt Case, had deliberately violated the Crders of the Court by refusing to resign. till the Contempt Case had been filed against him. As far as the respondents 1 to 4, in the Contempt Case, are 11. concerned, though they cannot deny that they were unaware of the Crders of the Court, have a valid defense on the ground that Writ Petitioners had not made any allegations against them of refusing to comply with the directions of 6 the Court despite the notice of the Orders of the Court. Even otherwise, the respondents 1 to 4 were only supervisory authorities and no allegation seems to have been made against these persons that they had been approached by the Writ Petitioners for compliance of the directions of the Court and that they had refused. In such circumstances, this Court is of the opinion .that a case of willful violation of the Orders of the Court, attracting the penal provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, does not appear to be made out against them. To this extent, the appeals filed by these respondents are allowed and the order of conviction and payment of fine by them is set aside. 12. As far as the respondents 5 & 6 are concerned, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the findings of the Learned Single Judge that both respondents 5 & 6, in the Contempt Case, had refused to comply with the directions of the Court despite the knowledge of the said Orders. In th the circumstances, the conviction and levy of fine of Rs.1,500/- on the 6 respondent does not require any interference and the same is confirmed. Accordingly, Contempt Appeal No.16 of 2015 is dismissed. The 5‘^ respondent had been convicted for violation of the Orders of the Court and sentenced to simple imprisonment for a period of three 13. months apart from payment of fine of Rs.1,500/-. in view of the fact that the sentence of simple imprisonment, for a period of three months, had been hanging over the head of the 5*^ respondent for nine years is, to the mind of this Court, sufficient punishment as far as the sentence of simple imprisonment is concerned. In the circumstances, the Judgment of the 7 1 Learned Single Judge convicting the 5^*^ respondent, in the Contempt Case, is confirmed. However, the sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of three months and payment of fine of Rs.1,500/- is modified by setting aside the sentence of simple imprisonment for a period of three months and confirming the sentence of payment of fine of Rs.1,500/-. 14. The respondents 5 & 6 shall pay the aforesaid fine of Rs.1,500/- within in three weeks failing which they shall undergo simple imprisonment of one week each. 15. Accordingly, the Contempt Appeal Nos.12 to 15 of 2015 are allowed. Contempt Appeal No.16 of 2015 is dismissed and Contempt Appeal No.17 of 2015 is partly allowed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Registrar (Judicial), High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 2. The General Secretary, Sri Balusulamma Thalli Temple Committee, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, years, resident of (Regd.No.212/2011), A.Narasimharao s/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 3. A.Narasimha Rao, S/o Simhachalam, Aged 49 years, resident of Ammavari Park Street, Masjid Centre, Tadepalligudem. 4. Ms. Anuradha, Commissioner, Endowments Department, Govt, of Andhra Pradesh, Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. c 5. Mr. G. Suri Babu, Deputy Commissioner of Endowments East Godavari district. 6. Mr. Satyanarayana, Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, vV.G. district. 7. Mr. Sri Rangam Ramanjaneyulu, S/o Satyanarayana, Tadepalligudem, Balusalamma Talli Temple, W.G. district. 8. K.V. Ramana, Inspector of Endowments Dept., T.P. Gudem,. W.G. district. Kakinada 9. Two CC’s to the Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10. Two CC's to The GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 11.The Section Officer, O.S. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi. 12.The Section Officer, Accounts Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 13. One CC to Sri K S Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 14.One CC to Sri Bala Mohan Rao S., Advocate [OPUC] 15.One CC to Sri Sri Nagaraju Naguru, Advocate [OPUC] 16.Three CD Copies at SAM sree HIGH COURT DATED:25/02/2025 COMMON ORDER CA.Nos.12,13, 14, 15,16 & 17 of 2015 & I 1 9 MAR 2025 s Current Section ALLOWING THE C.A.Nos.12, 13, 14, 15 of 2015 AND DISSMISSING THE C.A.No.16 of 2015 AND PARTLY ALLOWING THE C.A.No.17 of 2015