2025:JHHC:15195 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6250 of 2024 ------ Rita Gupta @ Rita Devi, wife of Parma Nand Das, resident of village Darshanam Anblia Opp. MM Vora Showroom, PO and PS Vadodara, District Vadodara, Gujarat … … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. ----- 04/ 12.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending her arrest for offences registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in connection with Sakchi PS Case No. 171 of 2023 corresponding to GR No. 1879 of 2023. 3. As per the FIR one premise was raided by the police on the allegation that on the said premise forged documents like educational certificates of various Universities are being prepared. From the said premises one Sunny Kumar Gupta and Shubham Sah was apprehended and laptops were seized. They disclosed that they worked for this petitioner and Dharmjit Kumar Gupta and they make certificates of various Universities. They disclosed that Sunny Kumar looks after the accounts and Shubham Kumar looks after the data entry. 2025:JHHC:15195 2 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that solely on the basis of confessional statement of the accused, the petitioner has been roped in this case, thus, this petitioner may be granted privilege of anticipatory bail. 5. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that this case needs extensive investigation and if necessary custodial investigation also, as the allegation is absolutely serious. 6. Considering the submission of the learned APP and the fact that there is an allegation against the petitioner that she was the mastermind and running the entire business of making forged educational certificates by employing the persons, this Court finds it not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as this case needs extensive investigation involving the petitioner and other accused. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3