HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18048/2016 Shri Ashok Chandak S/o Shri Madan Lal Chandak, B-37-38, Hanuman Nagar, Khatipura, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India Through Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Rajasthan, Jaipur, Ncrb, Statue Circle Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 3. The Director General Of Income Tax Inv., Ncrb, Statue Circle Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, 10/503 Allenganj, Kanpur- 208002 5. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle- 3, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur Rajasthan 6. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle- 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur-208002 ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18049/2016 M/s Mahadev Enclave Private Limited Through Its Authorized Person Shri Raghav Chandak S/o Shri Asho, Registered Office At B-37, Ayodhaya Marg, Hanuman Marg, Sirsi Road, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India Through Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Rajasthan, Jaipur, Ncrb, Statue Circle Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 3. The Director General Of Income Tax Inv., Ncrb, Statue Circle Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, (2 of 3) [CW-18048/2016] 10/503 Allenganj, Kanpur- 208002 5. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle- 3, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur Rajasthan 6. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle- 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur-208002 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Naresh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Siddharth Bapna, Adv. with Mr.Meyhul Mittal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/03/2025 1. These petitions are filed challenging the orders dated 09.12.2016 passed under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) transferring the cases of the assessees from Jaipur to Kanpur. 2. On 17.03.2025 the following order was passed:- “Learned counsel for the respondent submits that there was subsequent search carried out at Jaipur and the blocked assessment proceedings in pursuance of later search are pending at Jaipur, seeks time to have instructions vis-a-vis the present case. Put up on 20.03.2025 at top of the cause list.” 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on written instruction dated 18.03.2025, submits that the department is not pressing for change of jurisdiction by the impugned orders and the (3 of 3) [CW-18048/2016] proceedings shall be continued at Jaipur. Copy of written instruction is taken on record. 4. In view of the above, these petitions are disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/167-168