Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25603 (CHH)

RADHESHYAM SEN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3206/2023 · 2025-03-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14834 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3206 of 2023 1 - Radheshyam Sen S/o Kanhaiya Sen Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Kodwa, P.S. Palari, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Balodabazar- Bhatapara, C.G. 2 - The Registrar Co-Operative Societies, Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Dedhipara Deshha Sen Samaj Lavanraj Through President Shri Pyarelal Sen, S/o Latel Sen, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Kodwa, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Muleshwar Sen S/o Dukhuram Aged About 55 Years Ex- President, Dedhipara Deshha Sen Samaj Lavanraj, Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Hari S/o Saligram Aged About 45 Years Ex- Secretary, Dedhipara Deshha Sen Samaj Lavanraj, R/o Bus Stand Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.02 19:26:28 +0530 2 (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. C. R. Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondents No.4 & 5 : Mr. Roshan Kumbhare, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 27/03/2025 1. Heard Mr. C.R. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs. Upasana Mehta, learned Dy. GA for the State/respondent/s as well as Mr. Roshan Kumbhare, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. T. K. Jha, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the very outset fairly submits that he has taken instructions from the petitioner and accordingly on instruction he is praying for withdrawal of this petition. 3. As he has taken Court Slip mentioning withdrawal of the case, his prayer is not opposed by the other side. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi