BIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV ALIAS BIRENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5422/2025 · 2025-09-17
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25600 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25600 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:28471
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5422 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5422 of 2025
---- Birendra Kumar Yadav @ Birendra Yadav, age about 35 years, son of Sri Chandradev Yadav, resident of village – Pachghara Khurd, PO and PS – Bishrampur, District – Palamau
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Manoj Kr. No.2, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Advocate
---- 02/17.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bishrampur P.S. Case No.51 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 64(1) and 62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner was appointed by Panchayat Samiti to protect the forest land. He submits that the petitioner and the informant are co- villagers and the false allegations are made and in view of that the anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer
2025:JHHC:28471
--2-- A.B.A. No. 5422 of 2025
and submits that serious allegations are there against the petitioner.
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that the petitioner has outraged the modesty of the informant and on the voice raised by the informant peoples were assembled and thereafter the petitioner has left the place.
6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 17.09.2025 Sangam/