Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25600 (AP)

S Sreeram v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/7457/2025 · 2025-07-27

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-i-- ---L=- a+ / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7457 OF 2025 f/ Between : s.sreeram, s/o. s.Daveedu, age years, R/o. AIlimadugi Sangam, Bogolu Mandal, NeIIore DI'StriCt. ...PETITIONER /Accused AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through S.H.O., Somala P.S., Chittoor Dl-strict, Represented by public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT Petition under section 480, 483 of BNSS is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the crI-minal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on regular ba|ll in SC No, 34 of 2020 on the file of I Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District. lANO: 1 OF2025 petition under section 528 of BNSS is filed pray®Ing that in the c|lrcumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tO Permit the Petitioner {O amend the case sc No. 34/2020 as SCIE No. 34/2020 on the file of I Addl, District and sessions Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District, Pending disposal of CRLP 7457 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. ` The petition coming on for-hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Advocate for the petitioner, and of PUBLIC PR6sECUTOR for Respondent, and the Court made the follow-lng. ORDER: APHCO10361232025 ffiFELE lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Specja[ or[-g[[naI Jurjsdictjon) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CR[MI Between : S. Sreeram AND The State of Andhra pradesh Counsel for the petI-tiOner/accused: Thota Ramakoteswara Rao [3521] H.PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the Respondent/complainant.I Public Prosecutor The Court made the followI-ng: RDER The Crjmjnal petI'tiOn has been fI'Ied under sections 437 and 439 of the code of criminal Procedure,1973 (for brevity fthe cr.p.c.')/ sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatjya Nagarjk suraksha sanhjta, 2023 (for brev['{y fthe BNSSJ), seeking to enlarge the petitioner/Accused on bail I'n Crime No]83 of 2020 of somal poII®Ce Station, chjttoor DI'StrjCt, regl-stered aga['nst the petI'tiOner/Accused herein for the offence punishable under section 379 of \. •.:`ti+ Dr.YLR, J Crl.P.No.7457 of 2025 Dated 28.07.2025 Indian Penal Code,1860 (for brev-lty [the I.P.C') and 136 (1)(A) EIectricity Act, 2003 (for brevity tthe Act'). 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. The learned Trial Court issued Non-Baiiable Warrant on 12.09.2023, as the petitioner/accused failed appear before the learned Court on that date. Pursuan{ to the execution of the NBW, the petitioner wats remanded to judicial custody. It appears that the petitioner failed to appear before the Trial Court only one occasion, for which the Court issued NBW. The Court did not recall the warrant and consequently remanded him to the judic'lal custody. The petitioner is aged about 50 years and has a fixed abode and permanent residence at AIIimadugi Sangam, Bogolu'Mandal, Nellore District. If one more opportunity is given, the petitioner would appear regularly before the learned Trial Court. 4. Further, keeping the petitioner in the judicial custody for long time would not serve any purpose. If some stringent conditions are imposed on the p'etitioner for his appearance before the learned Trial Court, it would serve the Purpose. 5. In the result,I the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following conditions: 3 Dr.YLR, J CrI.P.No.7457 of2025 Dated 28.07.2025 i. The Petitioner/Accused shall be enlarged on bail subjectto he executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only), each with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfactI'On Of the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. ii. The Petitl'oner/Accused shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every adjournment and cooperate with the learned Trial Court for disposal of the case. iii. The learned Trial Court is directed complete the trial in S.C.I.E.No.34 of 2020 on the file of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor, preferably within a period of six (o6) months. SD/- P.VINOD KUn;`EAR ASSISTANT RgrAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER F To, 1. The S.H.O., Somala P.S., Chittoor Distr'lct. 2. The I Additional Distr-lot & Sessions Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 3. The Superintendent, Sub-Jail, Chittoor, Chittoor District. 4. One CC to SRl. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OPUC] 6. One spare COPY KN HIGH COURT DR.YLR]J DATED : 28/07/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.7457 of 2025 ALLOWED _i__.i