Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2560 (RAJ)

SUNITA W/O SATYANARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/93/2025 · 2025-02-03

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4684] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 93/2025 1. Sunita W/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Neemli Khurd, Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur. 2. Rukmani W/o Babulal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Neemli Khurd, Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Timan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 03/02/2025 1. Petitioners have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.400/2024 registered with the Police Station, Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 189(2) of B.N.S. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material available on record. 4. On perusal of the averments made in the F.I.R., no specific overt act has been assigned to the present petitioners. The petitioners are women and the criminal law also speaks that while dealing with the cases of women, their cases are to be placed at [2025:RJ-JP:4684] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-93/2025] different footings. 5. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that no specific overt act has been assigned to the present petitioners and they are women, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to extend the anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station, Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur in F.I.R. No. 400/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /33