M/S FORTUNE AGRO IMPLEX v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
CSTA/5/2025 · 2026-09-10
B M Shyam Prasad, T M Nadaf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2560 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50068-DB CSTA No. 5 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
M/S FORTUNE AGRO IMPLEX REP. BY ITS PARTNER SHRI. SREEPADA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS FORTUNE HOUSE, NO.343, 9TH BLOCK, SIR M. VISVESVARAYA LAYOUT, KENGUNTE FIRST MAIN ROAD, (MALLATHAHALLI LAKE ROAD) BANGALORE - 560 056.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VASANTH J.,ADVOCATE) AND:
THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS C.R. BUILDING, P.B. NO. 5400,
Digitally Signed by REKHA R Location : High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50068-DB CSTA No. 5 of 2025
QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
THIS CUSTOMS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.130 OF THE CUSTOMS ACT 1962, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THAT PORTION OF THE FINAL ORDER NO. 20796- 20797/2024 DATED 19.09.2024 PASSED BY THE HONBLE CESTAT THAT UPHOLDS THE IMPOSITION OF REDUCED FINE UNDER SEC. 125 AND PENALTY UNDER SEC. 114A OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 AND PASS ANY SUCH FURTHER ORDERS AS MAY BE DEEMED FIT
AND PROPER IN THE
FACTS CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50068-DB CSTA No. 5 of 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD)
This Court's previous order dated 28.10.2025 reads as under:
"As requested, the learned counsel is permitted comply with the office objections within three weeks lest the appeal be dismissed for default on the next date of hearing.
The office is directed to re-list this appeal on 25.11.2025."
It is pointed out by the office that the Court fee is not paid. None appears for the appellant. This Court can infer lack of interest. The petition stands dismissed for default.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
SA ct:sr