ADANI TRANSMISSION LIMITED v. M/S SUMOTECH INNOVATION PVT. LTD.
I.A.(Civil)/3022/2025 · 2026-02-16
Devashis Baruah
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2560 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2560 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010206722025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/3022/2025 ADANI TRANSMISSION LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT SHANTIGRAM NEAR VAISHNO DEVI CIRCLE S G HIGHWAY KHODIYAR AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD GUJARAT PIN-382431 VERSUS M/S SUMOTECH INNOVATION PVT. LTD.
A PRIVATE LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMAPNIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 602 WING B DLH METRO VIEW PLOT 195 PT J.P ROAD OPPOSITE SHANKAR NAGAR ANDHERI (WEST) P.O.- MUMBAI MAHARASHTRA-400058 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI GANESH SWAMY S/O LATE ANGU SWAMI
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. B. D. Deka, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, Advocate
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
17.02.2026
Heard Mr. B. D. Deka, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the defendant No.5/applicant, and Mr. B. J. Mukherjee, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the plaintiff/opposite party.
2. This is an application filed for rejection of the plaint or return of the plaint on the ground that after filing of a counterclaim in the proceedings under Section 104 of the Patents Act, 1970, the District Judge, Kamrup (Metro) did not have the jurisdiction to entertain the said proceedings.
3. Taking into account that in terms with Section 104 of the Patents Act, 1970, the matter has been laid before this Court, nothing further survives in the instant application.
4. Accordingly, the said application stands rejected.
5. The I.A. stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant