Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25593 (BOM)

VIKRAM MANIK PATIL L.RS. LILABAI VIKRAM PATIL AND OTHERS v. RUKHMABAI GAYABU PATIL L.RS. RAMESH GAYABU PATIL AND ORS

CA/8187/2025 · 2025-08-04

Shri R M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

69-8188-8187.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8188 OF 2025 IN SA/173/2016 Vikram Manik Patil L.rs. Lilabai Vikram Patil And Others VERSUS Rukhmabai Gayabu Patil L.rs. Ramesh Gayabu Patil And Others WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8187 OF 2025 IN SA/172/2016 Vikram Manik Patil L.rs. Lilabai Vikram Patil And Others VERSUS Rukhmabai Gayabu Patil L.rs. Ramesh Gayabu Patil And Ors … Mr. H. P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. M. L. Sangit, Advocate for Respondent No 1 Mr. P. P. Dhorde, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 *** CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J DATE : AUGUST 04, 2025 PER COURT : 1. These Applications are for extension of time to carryout amendment as per order passed by this Court dated 31.01.2022 by condonation of delay. Applications are opposed by Respondents. 2. The amendment was allowed which indicates that the amendment is relevant for decision of the Appeals. Umesh PAGE 1 OF 2 2025:BHC-AUG:20539 69-8188-8187.odt In such circumstances, in order to decide Appeals on merit, the amendment would be necessary. Since there is delay of around three years, the Appellant is directed to pay cost of Rs. 3000/- for each Applications payable to Advocate’s Association of High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. Cost be deposited within a weeks. 3. Subject to deposit of cost, applications are allowed. Amendment be carried out within two weeks. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Umesh PAGE 2 OF 2