1 2025:CGHC:27568-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1948 of 2025 Geeta Patel D/o Late Gajendra Prasad Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Dhanigaon P.S. Baramkela, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Superintendent Of Police, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 2 - State House Officer P.S. Baramkela District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 3 - Bihari Lal Patel S/o Hemsagar Patel Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Dhanigaon P.S. Baramkela, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) 4 - Hemsagar Patel S/o Rusiram Patel Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Dhanigaon P.S. Baramkela, District - Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sushant Yadav, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.06.26 10:38:00 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 25/06/2025 1. Heard Mr. Sushant Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Malay Jain, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the impugned FIR & entire criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant to impugned FIR bearing crime no.91/2025 for the offences punishable U/s 294, 506 & 323 of I.P.C at P.S. Baramkela, Dist: Bilaigarh-Sarangarh (CG), in the interest of justice.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court has observed that the petitioner has filed the present petition without appropriate prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayer as there is offence in the prayer have not mentioned to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Village Pendri, District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.). 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner/ State after obtaining the photocopy of the same. - Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice $ Bhilwar/ Jyoti