VIVEK KUMAR PRASAD ALIAS VIVEK PRASAD v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5659/2025 · 2025-09-23
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25588 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25588 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:29474
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5659 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5659 of 2025
----
1. Vivek Kumar Prasad @ Vivek Prasad, aged about 32 years, S/o Maheshwar Prasad, R/o Bagbeda Colony, Road No.6, Qtr. No. 185/2/3, PO and PS – Bagbeda, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
2. Atul Kumar Prasad @ Atul Kumar, aged about 27 years, S/o Maheshwar Prasad, R/o Bagbeda Colony, Road No.6, Qtr. No. 185/2/3, PO and PS – Bagbeda, Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Chandana Prasad, W/o Vivek Kumar Prasad and D/o Anant Prasad, R/o vill- Kalimati, Mahuliya, PO – Mahuliya, PS – Galudih, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
.... Opposite Parties
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Pathak, Advocate
:- Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Advocate
---- 04/23.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.234 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 498A, 315, 323, 341 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Ghatsila.
2025:JHHC:29474
--2-- A.B.A. No. 5659 of 2025
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1 is the husband and petitioner No.2 is the brother-in- law of the complainant. He further submits that there are general and omnibus allegation of assault and demand of dowry against the petitioners.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner No.1 is the husband and in view of that the anticipatory bail of the petitioners may kindly be rejected.
5. It is an admitted position that the petitioner No.1 is the husband and petitioner No.2 is the brother-in-law of the complainant and the allegation are made of demand of dowry and torture and the case has been registered against all the accused persons and the rest of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by learned Sessions Judge and in that view of the matter the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 23.09.2025 Sangam/