2025:JHHC:18054 --1-- C.M.P. No. 587 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.M.P. No. 587 of 2022 ---- 1. Lothe Oraon (Pahan), aged about 64 years, son of Late Sukra Pahan 2. Bhado Devi, aged about 45 years, widow of Late Narayan Oraon (Pahan) Both residents of village – Asni, PO and PS – Gumla, District – Gumla .... Petitioners -- Versus -- 1. Dilip Pahan, son of Late Jharia Pahan 2. Sariya Pahnain, wife of Late Gobardhan Pahan 3. Faguwa Oraon (Pahan) 4. Gocha Oraon (Pahan) Both sons of Late Jawra Oraon (Pahan) 5. Chanda Pahan 6. Dukhram Pahan, both sons of Late Desa Pahan 7. Harbhu Pahan 8. Bhauka Pahan, both sons of Late Majhi Pahan 9. Sukro Devi 10. Biswanath Pahan, son of Late Chhoteya Pahan 11. Birendra Pahan 12. Ajay Pahan 13. Vijay Pahan, all sons of Late Gobardhan Pahan and resident of village Asni, PO and PS – Gumla, District - Gumla 14. Anand Pahan, son of Late Panduwa Pahan, resident of village – Asni Tetartoli, PO and PS – Gumla, District – Gumla 15. Deputy Commissioner, Gumla, PO and PS – Gumla, District – Gumla 16. Anand Pahan 17. Amar Pahan Both sons of Late Charwa Pahan, residents of village – Asni, PO and PS – Gumla, District - Gumla .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- 2025:JHHC:18054 --2-- C.M.P. No. 587 of 2022 For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For O.P. No.15 :- Mr. Mihir Kunal Ekka, Advocate ---- 05/04.07.2025 I.A. No.4920 of 2024 has been filed for condoning the delay of 93 days in filing of the C.M.P. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the M.A. No.446 of 2018 was dismissed for non-compliance of the pre- emptory order and according to him that pre-emptory order was passed on 29.01.2020 and due to covid-19 the said were not removed within time and in view of that the said delay has occurred in filing of the C.M.P. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has got no serious objection if the delay of 93 days is condoned. 4. The Court finds that sufficient ground is made out for condoning the delay of 93 days considering the Covid-19 was prevalent at that time, as such the delay of 93 days is hereby condoned. 5. I.A. allowed and disposed of. 6. This C.M.P. has been filed for restoration of M.A. No.446 of 2018 which was dismissed for non-compliance of pre-emptory order. 7. For the reasons assigned in the C.M.P., the Court finds that sufficient ground is made out to restore the said M.A., as such M.A. No.446 of 2018 is restored to its original file. 8. This C.M.P. is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/