Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25580 (RAJ)

GOMA RAM S/O SHRI BHURA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9662/2025 · 2025-07-31

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9662/2025 Goma Ram S/o Shri Bhura Ram, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Manani Ki Dhani Tan Dhaka Ki Dhani Nawalgarh Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, Raj. (At Present Petitioner Confined At District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atar Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma Mr. Saransh Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/07/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0066/2025 registered at Police Station-Nawalgarh, District-Jhunjhunu for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 3(5) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per the FIR, alleged injury caused to the injured-Kailash on the head is attributed to Phool Chand and with respect to present petitioner, there is allegation that he with the help of a stick inflicted blows to the injured-Kailash. He further submits that as per the medical report, [2025:RJ-JP:29055] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9662/2025] only one injury has been caused to the injured, which is not dangerous to life. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the Bars since 01.07.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Goma Ram S/o Shri Bhura Ram shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/107