[2025:RJ-JP:7399] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 134/2025 1. Sultan S/o Shri Uttam Singh, R/o Langari Ka Pura, Randauli Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 2. Ramdeen S/o Shri Uttam Singh, R/o Langari Ka Pura, Randauli Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 3. Ramdhar S/o Shri Uttam Singh, R/o Langari Ka Pura, Randauli Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.582/2024 registered at Police Station Mania, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 74, 324(4), 324(5), 109(1), 351(2), 351(3) & 333 of BNS. Later on police filed charge- sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 332(b), 352, 74, 109(1) & 3(5) of BNS and Section 3(1)/25(1)(b) of Arms Act. [2025:RJ-JP:7399] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-134/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is allegation against the petitioners to open the fire but none of the injured has sustained firearm injury. Counsel submits that injuries sustained to both the injured are simple in nature. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of petitioners Sultan & Ramdeen and one another case has been registered against the petitioner Ramdhar of simple nature. Petitioners are in custody since 13.12.2024 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the material available on record in the form of case diary including the nature of injuries; charge- sheet has been filed in this matter; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Sultan S/o Shri Uttam Singh, (2) Ramdeen S/o Shri Uttam Singh & (3) Ramdhar S/o Shri Uttam Singh shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of [2025:RJ-JP:7399] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-134/2025] Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /106