INDIRA DEVI v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SIRMAUR AND ANOTHER
CMPMO/654/2024 · 2025-03-10
Satyen Vaidya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25579 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25579 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:HHC:5498 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMPMO No. 654 of 2024
Date of decision : 10.3.2025. Indira Devi
...Petitioner.
Versus Deputy Commissioner Sirmour at Nahan & another
...Respondents
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Hemant K. Verma, DAG.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief claimed in the petition has been rendered infructuous on account of intervening circumstances. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Satyen Vaidya)
Judge 10th March, 2025
(kck)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the
judgment?