APHC010361632020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1304 OF 2020 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed being aggrieved by the Decree and Order passed in I.A.No.468 of 2019 in A.S. No.20 of 2012, dated 05.12.2019, on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. BETWEEN: Yarramaneni Hanumantha Rao, S/o. Janardhana Rao, Hindu, Aged about 60 years, R/o. D.No.2-8, Kotikalapudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioner/Petitioner/APPELLANT AND 1. Namburi Tirupati Rao, (Died), 2. Smt Namburi Alivelu, W/o. Late Tirupati Rao, Hindu, Aged about 38 years, R/o. Kotikalapudi Village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District. 3. Namburi Ramyasri, D/o. Late Tirupathi Rao, Hindu, Aged about 15 Being Minor Rep. by her mother and natural guardian. The Respondent herein, resident of Kotikalapudi Village, years proposed 2 Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Krishna District. nd ...Respondents/Respondents/Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in A.S.No.51 of 2016, pending on the file of the Hon'ble VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner:- SRI. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:- SRI. P. DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: * ■ APHC010361632020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] ^1 ■ TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1304/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER Yarramaneni Hanumantha Rao AND ...RESPONDENT(S) Namburi Tirupati Rao Died and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.P DURGA PRASAD A The Court made the following ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the dispute between the parties is settled before the Lok Adalat. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on 2. record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No 3. order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ^ \ r //TRUE COPY// .1 SECTIOI^ OFFICER To, 1. The VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. One CC to Sri. Chalasani ajay kumar. Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. P Durga Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Two C.D Copies. Ssl vna HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER CRP.NO. 1304 OF 2020 $( 2 2 SEP 2025 jS ^S^jjjrrentScctioflx^ «<» DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS